All modern application auditing processes and methodologies are known to our experienced team. Speak to our experts about effective Source Code Review Service
Manual vs. Automatic
Tools that check for common source code vulnerabilities perform the automatic code review. Although these automated tools are quick, they are not suggested for in-depth assessments. Manual audits are thorough and can be applied to any programming language, making them the best option.
Dynamic vs. Static
When a program is not in use, static source code analysis is performed. This allows for the detection of malicious code and programming faults. During the course of the program's execution, a dynamic review is carried out. The latter keeps track of the entire performance of the software, such as response time and usability. Both approaches are valuable and compliment one another. Also look into our Static Code Review Company services.
White box vs. black box
The amount of source code information provided to the tester or reviewer is the difference between black box and white box reviews. The analysis is done blindly without access to the source code in a black box review. Reverse engineering and penetration testing are two techniques that can be used in a black box evaluation. A white box review, on the other hand, is conducted with complete source code access. The white box method is used for standard secure code reviews.
Internal vs. Outside
During the development phase, people of the organization perform an internal code review, while an outsourced team performs an external code review. The external evaluation panel is completely unbiased and provides a fresh perspective. Both techniques of review are important and complement one another.